A 20 something year old man… 
(according to victim on edf).
2 Likes
I am not sure it would be helpful to speculate any further, but you are right the victim and the victim’s friend both talk about a young man in his twenties.
I was sure that the person I saw fitting that description was a man. However, I didn’t stop to get a good look so I could have been mistaken.
There was strong police presence on Wood Vale on Monday night, which was very reassuring. It is also very reassuring that they have made an arrest. I will still be very aware of my surroundings when on Wood Vale.
5 Likes
If a person is transgender, the police will refer to them as their preferred gender/pro-nouns, even if they haven’t legally transitioned or don’t ‘pass’ as the other sex.
5 Likes
That is something I hadn’t even considered and could explain it.
It was just so odd that the description of the eye witnesses - a man in his twenties was so different from the description of the person arrested - a woman in their 50s.
Anyway that aside I hope that the person responsible is no longer in the area to attack women.
I’m all for respecting how people identify and using correct gender pronouns, but if this is the case here - and we don’t know that is it - it might be more reassuring and less questionable if the police could issue a statement along the lines of “a suspect matching eye-witness descriptions has been arrested…”
I am pleased that patrols in the area have reportedly been increased.
5 Likes
1 Like
This post was flagged and is temporarily hidden.
Maybe best not to speculate, in case it goes to a jury trial?
1 Like
It’s not going down well on Dulwich Hill police’s Twitter feed:
1 Like
I’m not remotely surprised by the replies. Will be very interesting to see what details come out next
1 Like
Seems the victim is satisfied that the person in custody is the person who attacked her (per her last post on the ED forum), which is a relief to hear.
“Hi I was the lady who was attacked and can say that the person who attacked me is in custody. I would ask people not to speculate if possible as I have been advised by the police that it’s in judicial proceedings which I don’t want to jeopardise. Many thanks”
3 Likes
I think the transgender thing is being made more of an issue than it should be (if it’s even true) - the main thing is the person is behind bars. It would be different if the attacker was still on the loose, but in that case the police reports and warnings can only ever go by physical characteristics observed by the victim(s) and so this person would be (and was) described as a “man”.
What is more shocking to me is the police response to the first victim which, if true, may have caused 3 more women to be violently attacked on the same street - one with a knife.
3 Likes
Yep, the gender speculation is detracting from the real scandal here
2 Likes
Good morning everyone,
Apologies for not updating sooner. I can confirm that the individual was arrested and they appeared in court yesterday, the detectives who lead the investigation have linked the four incidents that occurred over the weekend and they have been charged with four offences. I will share what I can with you when I have further information. We have increased our patrols in the area for some added reassurance, PCSO Mccreery should also be around today, please say hello if you see us. I do not yet have an update with the outcome at court.
Kind regards,
PC Kemal
6 Likes
I think the problem was that because the victims and eyewitnesses had described the perpetrator as looking like a man and the police said they’d arrested a woman no one knew whether they needed to worry about whether the perpetrator was still at large.
But as you say the real point is that the 999 wasn’t responded to. I know the police have had such resourcing trouble that they can’t take action about burglaries, antisocial behaviour and car crime etc, but naively I had always assumed that if I was actually in danger and I called 999 they would come. I suppose at least I have more realistic expectations now.
It’s a shame because the initial victim said the perpetrator was still in the area that evening after the attack so if her calls had been responded to the person could have been identified and apprehended earlier.
4 Likes
Has s/he been caught yet? I need to go the supermarket and wondering whether I need to take a weapon! 
If You have arrested the individual who committed these attacks WHY are you increasing patrols in the area over the weekend?
Talk about shutting the stable door when the horse has bolted!
And where was the police response when the first victim called 999 with the attacker still in her line of vision in the vicinity ?
3 other women were attacked because of the lack of police response.
We are not happy.
Women do not feel safe on the streets any more if this can happen in broad daylight with a witness and it took 3 days for the police to bother to get a statement from what I gather.
5 Likes
It’s not that long ago when there was that guy chasing people around being aggressive with an umbrella around FH/Kirkdale. These attacks in Woodvale are a particular concern to me though as attacking in broad daylight it is a very brave and confident thing to do, not exactly the same as preying on someone falling out of a nightclub drunk at 4am (not that that is acceptable, either).
Thanks for the reply but I cannot seem to make sense of anything I read that has been issued by the police. One lady was attacked with a child next to her if I am correct? Seems a very dangerous person to still be on the streets, and unclear whether it is safe to leave home alone as these attacks were in daylight. Can the police be clear about whether the person has been caught, and if so, why was the attacker a male, and then suddenly a 50+year old woman…